Effect of oral environmental pH on the dynamic characterization of bioactive restorative materials

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of oral environmental pH on the viscoelastic properties of bioactive restorative materials (BRMs) by using dynamic mechanical analysis. Stainless steel molds were used to fabricate 40 beam-shaped specimens (12 × 2 × 2 mm) for each materi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ong, Joshua Ee Xin, Yap, Adrian U-Jin, Azwatee Abdul Aziz,, Noor Azlin Yahya,
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2022
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/20652/1/20.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/20652/
https://www.ukm.my/jsm/malay_journals/jilid51bil9_2022/KandunganJilid51Bil9_2022.html
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-ukm.journal.20652
record_format eprints
spelling my-ukm.journal.206522022-12-07T00:42:33Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/20652/ Effect of oral environmental pH on the dynamic characterization of bioactive restorative materials Ong, Joshua Ee Xin Yap, Adrian U-Jin Azwatee Abdul Aziz, Noor Azlin Yahya, The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of oral environmental pH on the viscoelastic properties of bioactive restorative materials (BRMs) by using dynamic mechanical analysis. Stainless steel molds were used to fabricate 40 beam-shaped specimens (12 × 2 × 2 mm) for each material. The specimens were finished, measured, randomly divided into four groups (n = 10), and immersed in aqueous solutions of pH 3.0, 5.0, 6.8 and 10.0 at 37 °C for seven days. The specimens were then subjected to dynamic mechanical analysis with a 5 N load and frequency range of 0.1-10.0 Hz. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA/Dunnet T3’s test (α = 0.05). Mean elastic modulus spanned from 2.68 ± 0.17 to 6.49 ± 0.71 GPa, while viscous modulus ranged from 0.43 ± 0.03 to 0.62 ± 0.12 GPa. Loss tangent differed from 77.30 ± 4.90 to 164.50 ± 9.12. Significant differences among pH were discerned for (i) Elastic modulus: Cention N - pH 3.0, 5.0, 10.0 > 6.8; Activa Bioactive - pH 3.0, 6.8, 10.0 > 5.0, (ii) Viscous modulus: Cention N - pH 3.0, 5.0, 10.0 > 6.8, and (iii) Loss tangent: Activa Bioactive - pH 5.0 > 3.0, 6.8, 10.0. Significant differences in viscoelastic properties were noted among the BRMs with Activa Bioactive presenting the lowest elastic modulus for all pH. Immersion of all materials in pH 6.8 yielded the highest elastic modulus, except for Activa Bioactive. The effects of environmental pH on viscoelastic properties of BRMs are material-dependent. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2022-09 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/20652/1/20.pdf Ong, Joshua Ee Xin and Yap, Adrian U-Jin and Azwatee Abdul Aziz, and Noor Azlin Yahya, (2022) Effect of oral environmental pH on the dynamic characterization of bioactive restorative materials. Sains Malaysiana, 51 (9). pp. 2999-3008. ISSN 0126-6039 https://www.ukm.my/jsm/malay_journals/jilid51bil9_2022/KandunganJilid51Bil9_2022.html
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
building Tun Sri Lanang Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
content_source UKM Journal Article Repository
url_provider http://journalarticle.ukm.my/
language English
description The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of oral environmental pH on the viscoelastic properties of bioactive restorative materials (BRMs) by using dynamic mechanical analysis. Stainless steel molds were used to fabricate 40 beam-shaped specimens (12 × 2 × 2 mm) for each material. The specimens were finished, measured, randomly divided into four groups (n = 10), and immersed in aqueous solutions of pH 3.0, 5.0, 6.8 and 10.0 at 37 °C for seven days. The specimens were then subjected to dynamic mechanical analysis with a 5 N load and frequency range of 0.1-10.0 Hz. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA/Dunnet T3’s test (α = 0.05). Mean elastic modulus spanned from 2.68 ± 0.17 to 6.49 ± 0.71 GPa, while viscous modulus ranged from 0.43 ± 0.03 to 0.62 ± 0.12 GPa. Loss tangent differed from 77.30 ± 4.90 to 164.50 ± 9.12. Significant differences among pH were discerned for (i) Elastic modulus: Cention N - pH 3.0, 5.0, 10.0 > 6.8; Activa Bioactive - pH 3.0, 6.8, 10.0 > 5.0, (ii) Viscous modulus: Cention N - pH 3.0, 5.0, 10.0 > 6.8, and (iii) Loss tangent: Activa Bioactive - pH 5.0 > 3.0, 6.8, 10.0. Significant differences in viscoelastic properties were noted among the BRMs with Activa Bioactive presenting the lowest elastic modulus for all pH. Immersion of all materials in pH 6.8 yielded the highest elastic modulus, except for Activa Bioactive. The effects of environmental pH on viscoelastic properties of BRMs are material-dependent.
format Article
author Ong, Joshua Ee Xin
Yap, Adrian U-Jin
Azwatee Abdul Aziz,
Noor Azlin Yahya,
spellingShingle Ong, Joshua Ee Xin
Yap, Adrian U-Jin
Azwatee Abdul Aziz,
Noor Azlin Yahya,
Effect of oral environmental pH on the dynamic characterization of bioactive restorative materials
author_facet Ong, Joshua Ee Xin
Yap, Adrian U-Jin
Azwatee Abdul Aziz,
Noor Azlin Yahya,
author_sort Ong, Joshua Ee Xin
title Effect of oral environmental pH on the dynamic characterization of bioactive restorative materials
title_short Effect of oral environmental pH on the dynamic characterization of bioactive restorative materials
title_full Effect of oral environmental pH on the dynamic characterization of bioactive restorative materials
title_fullStr Effect of oral environmental pH on the dynamic characterization of bioactive restorative materials
title_full_unstemmed Effect of oral environmental pH on the dynamic characterization of bioactive restorative materials
title_sort effect of oral environmental ph on the dynamic characterization of bioactive restorative materials
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
publishDate 2022
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/20652/1/20.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/20652/
https://www.ukm.my/jsm/malay_journals/jilid51bil9_2022/KandunganJilid51Bil9_2022.html
_version_ 1751537490648367104
score 13.18916