Radiograph’s reject rate among Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia dental undergraduates and its implications

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reject rate of periapical and bitewing radiographs among dental undergraduate students of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), identify the type of radiographic errors which are frequently encountered and compare reject rates between Year 3, Year 4 and Year...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Azizah Ahmad Fauzi,, Ng, Charisza Tze Xin, Wong, Li Li, Ho, Sin Yin, Atika Ashar,
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2021
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/18587/1/47016-160187-1-PB.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/18587/
https://ejournal.ukm.my/jskm/issue/view/1355
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-ukm.journal.18587
record_format eprints
spelling my-ukm.journal.185872022-05-17T06:51:28Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/18587/ Radiograph’s reject rate among Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia dental undergraduates and its implications Azizah Ahmad Fauzi, Ng, Charisza Tze Xin Wong, Li Li Ho, Sin Yin Atika Ashar, The aim of this study was to evaluate the reject rate of periapical and bitewing radiographs among dental undergraduate students of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), identify the type of radiographic errors which are frequently encountered and compare reject rates between Year 3, Year 4 and Year 5 dental undergraduates. 118 rejected periapical radiographs and 27 rejected bitewing radiographs were collected from the UKM dental undergraduates’ polyclinics for a duration of 10 months. These rejected radiographs were further evaluated to determine the type of radiographic error. A spiking increase in periapical radiographs reject rate from Year 3 (4%) to Year 4 (11%) was observed. This finding was consistent with the statistically significant difference in the periapical radiographs reject rates for Year 3 and Year 4 (p = 0.0475). In periapical radiographs, the most frequently committed radiographic error was apical cut, followed by high density film. Vice versa, high density film was accounted as the most common radiographic error in bitewing radiography. Analysis of periapical and bitewing radiographs’ reject rates among UKM dental undergraduate entails the necessity to supervise undergraduate students regardless of the year of their undergraduate training in all aspects of the radiographic procedures which include positioning radiographic armamentarium, the setting of radiographic exposure time and the film processing procedure. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2021 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/18587/1/47016-160187-1-PB.pdf Azizah Ahmad Fauzi, and Ng, Charisza Tze Xin and Wong, Li Li and Ho, Sin Yin and Atika Ashar, (2021) Radiograph’s reject rate among Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia dental undergraduates and its implications. Jurnal Sains Kesihatan Malaysia, 19 (2). pp. 62-68. ISSN 1675-8161 https://ejournal.ukm.my/jskm/issue/view/1355
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
building Tun Sri Lanang Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
content_source UKM Journal Article Repository
url_provider http://journalarticle.ukm.my/
language English
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the reject rate of periapical and bitewing radiographs among dental undergraduate students of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), identify the type of radiographic errors which are frequently encountered and compare reject rates between Year 3, Year 4 and Year 5 dental undergraduates. 118 rejected periapical radiographs and 27 rejected bitewing radiographs were collected from the UKM dental undergraduates’ polyclinics for a duration of 10 months. These rejected radiographs were further evaluated to determine the type of radiographic error. A spiking increase in periapical radiographs reject rate from Year 3 (4%) to Year 4 (11%) was observed. This finding was consistent with the statistically significant difference in the periapical radiographs reject rates for Year 3 and Year 4 (p = 0.0475). In periapical radiographs, the most frequently committed radiographic error was apical cut, followed by high density film. Vice versa, high density film was accounted as the most common radiographic error in bitewing radiography. Analysis of periapical and bitewing radiographs’ reject rates among UKM dental undergraduate entails the necessity to supervise undergraduate students regardless of the year of their undergraduate training in all aspects of the radiographic procedures which include positioning radiographic armamentarium, the setting of radiographic exposure time and the film processing procedure.
format Article
author Azizah Ahmad Fauzi,
Ng, Charisza Tze Xin
Wong, Li Li
Ho, Sin Yin
Atika Ashar,
spellingShingle Azizah Ahmad Fauzi,
Ng, Charisza Tze Xin
Wong, Li Li
Ho, Sin Yin
Atika Ashar,
Radiograph’s reject rate among Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia dental undergraduates and its implications
author_facet Azizah Ahmad Fauzi,
Ng, Charisza Tze Xin
Wong, Li Li
Ho, Sin Yin
Atika Ashar,
author_sort Azizah Ahmad Fauzi,
title Radiograph’s reject rate among Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia dental undergraduates and its implications
title_short Radiograph’s reject rate among Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia dental undergraduates and its implications
title_full Radiograph’s reject rate among Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia dental undergraduates and its implications
title_fullStr Radiograph’s reject rate among Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia dental undergraduates and its implications
title_full_unstemmed Radiograph’s reject rate among Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia dental undergraduates and its implications
title_sort radiograph’s reject rate among universiti kebangsaan malaysia dental undergraduates and its implications
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
publishDate 2021
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/18587/1/47016-160187-1-PB.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/18587/
https://ejournal.ukm.my/jskm/issue/view/1355
_version_ 1734300924221849600
score 13.211869