The role of conventional and molecular cytogenetics in the diagnosis of microdeletion syndromes

In this report we demonstrate the role of fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and conventional cytogenetic methods in clinically and cytogenetically confirmed cases of microdeletion syndromes. A total of nine cases were referred to the Cytopathology and Cytogenetic Unit, Hospital Universiti Ke...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Salwati Shuib,, Sharifah Noor Akmal,, Zarina Abdul Latif,, Zubaidah Zakaria,, Nor Zarina Zainal Abidin,
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit UKM 2006
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/1857/1/08._45-52_%28MH_005%29.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/1857/
http://www.ppukm.ukm.my/ukmmcjournal/index.php
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-ukm.journal.1857
record_format eprints
spelling my-ukm.journal.18572016-12-14T06:30:21Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/1857/ The role of conventional and molecular cytogenetics in the diagnosis of microdeletion syndromes Salwati Shuib, Sharifah Noor Akmal, Zarina Abdul Latif, Zubaidah Zakaria, Nor Zarina Zainal Abidin, In this report we demonstrate the role of fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and conventional cytogenetic methods in clinically and cytogenetically confirmed cases of microdeletion syndromes. A total of nine cases were referred to the Cytopathology and Cytogenetic Unit, Hospital Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (HUKM) from 2002 to 2004. They include three Prader-Willi syndrome, three DiGeorge syndrome, one Williams syndrome, one Miller-Dieker syndrome and one Kallmann syndrome. Blood samples from the patients were cultured and harvested following standard procedures. Twenty metaphases were analysed for each of the cases. FISH analysis was carried out for all the cases using commercial probes (Vysis, USA): SNRPN and D15S10 for Prader-Willi syndrome, LIS1 for Miller Dieker syndrome, ELN for Williams syndrome, KAL for Kallmann syndrome, TUPLE 1 and D22S75 for DiGeorge syndrome. Conventional cytogenetic analysis revealed normal karyotypes in all but one case with structural abnormality involving chromosomes 9 and 22. FISH analysis showed microdeletions in all of the nine cases studied. This study has accomplished two important findings ie. while the FISH method is mandatory in ruling out microdeletion syndromes, conventional cytogenetics acts as a screening tool in revealing other chromosomal abnormalities that may be involved with the disease Penerbit UKM 2006 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/1857/1/08._45-52_%28MH_005%29.pdf Salwati Shuib, and Sharifah Noor Akmal, and Zarina Abdul Latif, and Zubaidah Zakaria, and Nor Zarina Zainal Abidin, (2006) The role of conventional and molecular cytogenetics in the diagnosis of microdeletion syndromes. Medicine & Health, 1 (1). http://www.ppukm.ukm.my/ukmmcjournal/index.php
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
building Perpustakaan Tun Sri Lanang Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
content_source UKM Journal Article Repository
url_provider http://journalarticle.ukm.my/
language English
description In this report we demonstrate the role of fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and conventional cytogenetic methods in clinically and cytogenetically confirmed cases of microdeletion syndromes. A total of nine cases were referred to the Cytopathology and Cytogenetic Unit, Hospital Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (HUKM) from 2002 to 2004. They include three Prader-Willi syndrome, three DiGeorge syndrome, one Williams syndrome, one Miller-Dieker syndrome and one Kallmann syndrome. Blood samples from the patients were cultured and harvested following standard procedures. Twenty metaphases were analysed for each of the cases. FISH analysis was carried out for all the cases using commercial probes (Vysis, USA): SNRPN and D15S10 for Prader-Willi syndrome, LIS1 for Miller Dieker syndrome, ELN for Williams syndrome, KAL for Kallmann syndrome, TUPLE 1 and D22S75 for DiGeorge syndrome. Conventional cytogenetic analysis revealed normal karyotypes in all but one case with structural abnormality involving chromosomes 9 and 22. FISH analysis showed microdeletions in all of the nine cases studied. This study has accomplished two important findings ie. while the FISH method is mandatory in ruling out microdeletion syndromes, conventional cytogenetics acts as a screening tool in revealing other chromosomal abnormalities that may be involved with the disease
format Article
author Salwati Shuib,
Sharifah Noor Akmal,
Zarina Abdul Latif,
Zubaidah Zakaria,
Nor Zarina Zainal Abidin,
spellingShingle Salwati Shuib,
Sharifah Noor Akmal,
Zarina Abdul Latif,
Zubaidah Zakaria,
Nor Zarina Zainal Abidin,
The role of conventional and molecular cytogenetics in the diagnosis of microdeletion syndromes
author_facet Salwati Shuib,
Sharifah Noor Akmal,
Zarina Abdul Latif,
Zubaidah Zakaria,
Nor Zarina Zainal Abidin,
author_sort Salwati Shuib,
title The role of conventional and molecular cytogenetics in the diagnosis of microdeletion syndromes
title_short The role of conventional and molecular cytogenetics in the diagnosis of microdeletion syndromes
title_full The role of conventional and molecular cytogenetics in the diagnosis of microdeletion syndromes
title_fullStr The role of conventional and molecular cytogenetics in the diagnosis of microdeletion syndromes
title_full_unstemmed The role of conventional and molecular cytogenetics in the diagnosis of microdeletion syndromes
title_sort role of conventional and molecular cytogenetics in the diagnosis of microdeletion syndromes
publisher Penerbit UKM
publishDate 2006
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/1857/1/08._45-52_%28MH_005%29.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/1857/
http://www.ppukm.ukm.my/ukmmcjournal/index.php
_version_ 1643735177705291776
score 13.160551