Moral reasoning theory : between Kohlberg’s and al-Ghazali’s perspective
The purpose of this study was to examine the moral theory in al-Ghazali's classic Islamic compared Kohlberg's theory of moral level. The method used is the document analysis method with references to al-Ghazali works 'Ihya' Ulum al-Din's and articles related to Kohlberg&#...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2021
|
| Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/18222/1/Fariza-IJIT-Vol-20-Dec-2021.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/18222/ http://www.ukm.my/ijit/volume-20-dec-2021/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The purpose of this study was to examine the moral theory in al-Ghazali's classic Islamic
compared Kohlberg's theory of moral level. The method used is the document analysis
method with references to al-Ghazali works 'Ihya' Ulum al-Din's and articles related to
Kohlberg's theory. The results show that there are similarities in the theory of moral
level developed by al-Ghazali with Kohlberg, although there are also have differences.
The level of moral reasoning classified by Kohlberg are divided into three which are preconventional,
conventional and post-conventional which have similarities to al-
Ghazali's moral classifications of the `awam, the khawas, and the khawas al-khawas.
The difference is that Kohlberg's moral level is purely cognitive in its focus on moral
reasoning, whereas al-Ghazali's moral level is on moral reasoning as well as behaviour. |
|---|