Anatomy of Africa’s evil Siamese twins: a comparative research of Boko Haram and al-Shabab
The activities of terrorist movements like the Boko Haram and the Al-Shabab in recent times have dealt a hefty blow to the collective stability of the African continent and its multi-pronged socio-economic fortunes. The ensuing debacles and the varying inundating levels of ignominy and infamy wr...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2020
|
Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/15641/1/39010-123842-1-SM.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/15641/ http://ejournals.ukm.my/jebat/issue/view/1260 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The activities of terrorist movements like the Boko Haram and
the Al-Shabab in recent times have dealt a hefty blow to the
collective stability of the African continent and its multi-pronged
socio-economic fortunes. The ensuing debacles and the varying
inundating levels of ignominy and infamy wreaked on Africa by
these groups have spontaneously elicited reactions from the global
community over the years. Though steady progress has been made
in this regard, the swinging and vacillating strategies of the sect
to adopting unconventional mediums to carrying out domestic
and transnational attacks leaves much to be desired. Relying on
secondary data, this study undertakes a comparative analysis of
the Boko Haram and Al-Shabab. Through a review of existing
documents, this article argues in line with policy ramifications
that, in as much as policy homogeneity may be essential, and
perhaps a sine qua non-alternative to be relied on in the quest for
the fight against these anti-social incendiary sects, there is still
less fruitful outcome and therefore necessitates the need for further
policy options. In conclusion, the research equally entreats a neck
turn consideration of experimenting with individual countryspecific policy options as a way to fight terrorism, all within a
much stronger broader international community framework. Until
this is considered, terrorism may remain an albatross around the
neck of Africa, and the international community whiles the fight
becomes a façade. |
---|