Doktrin Bush: Satu analisis hegemoni berideologi gramsci
The Bush Doctrine, identified with the document “The National Security Strategy of the United States” (2002) was articulated after the attack of 11th September 2001, or more commonly known as “9/11”. The two main pillars of the doctrine - preemptive attack and regime change - has been the subject...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Journal of Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2007
|
| Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/1533/1/takiy07.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/1533/ http://www.ukm.my/e-bangi/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The Bush Doctrine, identified with the document “The National Security
Strategy of the United States” (2002) was articulated after the attack of 11th
September 2001, or more commonly known as “9/11”. The two main pillars of
the doctrine - preemptive attack and regime change - has been the subject of
much debate on the pattern of foreign policy under the Bush administration.
Since a major objective of the doctrine as generally perceived by scholars was to
secure US hegemony in international politics, it is thus imperative to analyse the
relationship between the Bush Doctrine and the ideological hegemony theory, as
introduced by the Italian Marxist thinker, Antonio Gramsci (1891-1937). The
analysis will demonstrate that the Bush Doctrine seems to have failed to meet its
objective, and on the contrary, has experienced a strong counter-hegemony due
to the growing chaos and anarchy in the Iraq War |
|---|