Background information in the discussion sections of forestry journals: a case study

The Discussion section constitutes a powerful closing argument used by a researcher to highlight key findings in relation to the existing knowledge with the aim of facilitating readers’ comprehension of the entire study. As previous research has yet to identify the frequencies of the different ty...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Renu Joseph,, Lim, Jason Miin-Hwa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2018
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/13589/1/23459-69274-1-PB.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/13589/
http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/issue/view/1073
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-ukm.journal.13589
record_format eprints
spelling my-ukm.journal.135892019-10-26T22:49:43Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/13589/ Background information in the discussion sections of forestry journals: a case study Renu Joseph, Lim, Jason Miin-Hwa The Discussion section constitutes a powerful closing argument used by a researcher to highlight key findings in relation to the existing knowledge with the aim of facilitating readers’ comprehension of the entire study. As previous research has yet to identify the frequencies of the different types of background information and the language resources used to present them, this study sought to identify the types of background information employed by expert writers, ascertain the frequencies and positions of the information concerned, and explore how expert writers use lexico-grammatical resources to present such information in the Discussion sections of Forestry research reports. Using a genre-based analytical framework, 60 Discussion sections in Forestry journals were studied. The findings revealed that provision of essential background information is a principal communicative move appearing in 95% of Forestry Discussion sections. This section comprises (i) contextual and theoretical information aimed at facilitating readers’ comprehension of the findings to be presented, and (ii) a reiteration of objectives, methods and/or hypotheses of the research. Based on the findings, it is suggested that background information be highlighted to learners as a segment that serves a promotional function which emphasises the significance of their research topic in relation to the plenitude of past studies. Using the language resources identified in this study, it is recommended that lecturers teaching English for Research Purposes (ERP) focus on the use of (i) adjectives denoting prominence, (ii) investigative and procedural verbs, (iii) means and purposive adjuncts, and (iv) infinitive clauses describing expected behaviours in order to help learners clearly furnish relevant background information. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2018-02 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/13589/1/23459-69274-1-PB.pdf Renu Joseph, and Lim, Jason Miin-Hwa (2018) Background information in the discussion sections of forestry journals: a case study. GEMA ; Online Journal of Language Studies, 18 (1). pp. 198-216. ISSN 1675-8021 http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/issue/view/1073
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
building Tun Sri Lanang Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
content_source UKM Journal Article Repository
url_provider http://journalarticle.ukm.my/
language English
description The Discussion section constitutes a powerful closing argument used by a researcher to highlight key findings in relation to the existing knowledge with the aim of facilitating readers’ comprehension of the entire study. As previous research has yet to identify the frequencies of the different types of background information and the language resources used to present them, this study sought to identify the types of background information employed by expert writers, ascertain the frequencies and positions of the information concerned, and explore how expert writers use lexico-grammatical resources to present such information in the Discussion sections of Forestry research reports. Using a genre-based analytical framework, 60 Discussion sections in Forestry journals were studied. The findings revealed that provision of essential background information is a principal communicative move appearing in 95% of Forestry Discussion sections. This section comprises (i) contextual and theoretical information aimed at facilitating readers’ comprehension of the findings to be presented, and (ii) a reiteration of objectives, methods and/or hypotheses of the research. Based on the findings, it is suggested that background information be highlighted to learners as a segment that serves a promotional function which emphasises the significance of their research topic in relation to the plenitude of past studies. Using the language resources identified in this study, it is recommended that lecturers teaching English for Research Purposes (ERP) focus on the use of (i) adjectives denoting prominence, (ii) investigative and procedural verbs, (iii) means and purposive adjuncts, and (iv) infinitive clauses describing expected behaviours in order to help learners clearly furnish relevant background information.
format Article
author Renu Joseph,
Lim, Jason Miin-Hwa
spellingShingle Renu Joseph,
Lim, Jason Miin-Hwa
Background information in the discussion sections of forestry journals: a case study
author_facet Renu Joseph,
Lim, Jason Miin-Hwa
author_sort Renu Joseph,
title Background information in the discussion sections of forestry journals: a case study
title_short Background information in the discussion sections of forestry journals: a case study
title_full Background information in the discussion sections of forestry journals: a case study
title_fullStr Background information in the discussion sections of forestry journals: a case study
title_full_unstemmed Background information in the discussion sections of forestry journals: a case study
title_sort background information in the discussion sections of forestry journals: a case study
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
publishDate 2018
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/13589/1/23459-69274-1-PB.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/13589/
http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/issue/view/1073
_version_ 1648743842493497344
score 13.211869