Indigenous ambivalent figure in Jack Davis’s Play, The Dreamers
History of Australian Aboriginal’s colonisation, exploitation and assimilation has had ill effects on the performance of Indigenous gender relations, challenged the heteronormative conception of gender and directed Aboriginal people into shaping marginalised type of masculinities and femininities....
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2018
|
Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/12882/1/23100-78267-1-PB.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/12882/ http://ejournal.ukm.my/3l/issue/view/1096 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | History of Australian Aboriginal’s colonisation, exploitation and assimilation has had ill effects on the
performance of Indigenous gender relations, challenged the heteronormative conception of gender and directed
Aboriginal people into shaping marginalised type of masculinities and femininities. With this background, this
study attempts to depict the trajectory of shift in gender enactment of Aboriginal men and women in the pre and
post contact era. The purpose is to account for the gender enactment of Indigenous people of Australia as has
been veridically represented in Davis’s The Dreamers in the decades of 1970s and 1980s. Zooming in on such
issues as unemployment, imprisonment, alcohol consumption, and acts of violence, among others, this paper
argues that Indigenous characters in the play show signs of crisis of masculinity; in this regard, Tim Edwards’s
notion of the crisis of masculinity has been employed. As the counterbalance of Indigenous emasculated men,
however, the masculine performative role of Indigenous women has been highlighted. Raising these
assumptions, we touch upon Judith Butler’s notion of performativity and gender identity, at the heart of
theoretical framework, and prove the authority of our discussion regarding Indigenous ambivalent figures in the
light of Indigenous critics such as Brendan Hokowhitu, Kim Anderson and Shino Konishi, to name but a few. |
---|