TOPSIS-based Regression Algorithms Evaluation

This paper developed a multi-criteria decision-making approach using the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to benchmark the regression alternatives. Regression is used in diverse fields to predict consumer behavior, analyze business profitability, assess risk...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abu-Shareha, Ahmad Adel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universiti Utara Malaysia Press 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29109/1/JICT%2021%2004%202022%20513-547.pdf
https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29109/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uum.repo.29109
record_format eprints
spelling my.uum.repo.291092023-02-01T00:45:18Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29109/ TOPSIS-based Regression Algorithms Evaluation Abu-Shareha, Ahmad Adel QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science This paper developed a multi-criteria decision-making approach using the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to benchmark the regression alternatives. Regression is used in diverse fields to predict consumer behavior, analyze business profitability, assess risk, analyze automobile engine performance, predict biological system behavior, and analyze weather data. Each of these applications has its own set of concerns, resulting in various metrics utilizations or those of similar measures but with diverse preferences. Multi-criteria decision-making analyzes, compares, and ranks a set of alternatives utilizing mathematical and logical processes with a complicated and contradictory set of criteria. The developed approach established the weights, which were the core of the evaluation process, to various values to mimic and address the regression’s utilization in multiple applications with different concerns and using distinct datasets. The alternative judgment identified positive and negative ideal alternatives in the alternative space. The compared regression alternatives were scored and ranked based on their distance from these alternatives. The results showed that different preferences led to varying algorithm rankings, but top-ranked algorithms were distinguished using a specific dataset. Following that, using three datasets, namely Combined Cycle Power Plant, Real Estate, and Concrete, Voting using multiple classifiers (k-means-based classifiers) was the top-ranked in the Combined Cycle Power Plant and Real Estate datasets. In contrast, Decision Stump was the top-ranked in the Concrete dataset. Universiti Utara Malaysia Press 2022 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en cc4_by https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29109/1/JICT%2021%2004%202022%20513-547.pdf Abu-Shareha, Ahmad Adel (2022) TOPSIS-based Regression Algorithms Evaluation. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 21 (04). pp. 513-547. ISSN 2180-3862
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
building UUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Utara Malaysia
content_source UUM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://repo.uum.edu.my/
language English
topic QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
spellingShingle QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
Abu-Shareha, Ahmad Adel
TOPSIS-based Regression Algorithms Evaluation
description This paper developed a multi-criteria decision-making approach using the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to benchmark the regression alternatives. Regression is used in diverse fields to predict consumer behavior, analyze business profitability, assess risk, analyze automobile engine performance, predict biological system behavior, and analyze weather data. Each of these applications has its own set of concerns, resulting in various metrics utilizations or those of similar measures but with diverse preferences. Multi-criteria decision-making analyzes, compares, and ranks a set of alternatives utilizing mathematical and logical processes with a complicated and contradictory set of criteria. The developed approach established the weights, which were the core of the evaluation process, to various values to mimic and address the regression’s utilization in multiple applications with different concerns and using distinct datasets. The alternative judgment identified positive and negative ideal alternatives in the alternative space. The compared regression alternatives were scored and ranked based on their distance from these alternatives. The results showed that different preferences led to varying algorithm rankings, but top-ranked algorithms were distinguished using a specific dataset. Following that, using three datasets, namely Combined Cycle Power Plant, Real Estate, and Concrete, Voting using multiple classifiers (k-means-based classifiers) was the top-ranked in the Combined Cycle Power Plant and Real Estate datasets. In contrast, Decision Stump was the top-ranked in the Concrete dataset.
format Article
author Abu-Shareha, Ahmad Adel
author_facet Abu-Shareha, Ahmad Adel
author_sort Abu-Shareha, Ahmad Adel
title TOPSIS-based Regression Algorithms Evaluation
title_short TOPSIS-based Regression Algorithms Evaluation
title_full TOPSIS-based Regression Algorithms Evaluation
title_fullStr TOPSIS-based Regression Algorithms Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed TOPSIS-based Regression Algorithms Evaluation
title_sort topsis-based regression algorithms evaluation
publisher Universiti Utara Malaysia Press
publishDate 2022
url https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29109/1/JICT%2021%2004%202022%20513-547.pdf
https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29109/
_version_ 1756687047780728832
score 13.1944895