α-Glucosidase inhibitors: consistency of: in silico docking data with in vitro inhibitory data and inhibitory effect prediction of quercetin derivatives

The present study aims to investigate the relationship between in silico experimental data and in vitro inhibitory data of polyphenols against α-glucosidase. The CDOCKER protocol in Discovery Studio was used to dock various polyphenols to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae α-glucosidase crystal structure....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhu, Jianzhong, Zhang, Bin, Tan, Chin Ping, Huang, Qiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/82777/1/%CE%B1-Glucosidase%20inhibitors%20consistency%20of%20in%20silico%20docking%20data%20with%20in%20vitro%20inhibitory%20data%20and%20inhibitory%20effect%20prediction%20of%20quercetin%20derivatives.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/82777/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31517355/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.82777
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.827772020-10-16T06:09:07Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/82777/ α-Glucosidase inhibitors: consistency of: in silico docking data with in vitro inhibitory data and inhibitory effect prediction of quercetin derivatives Zhu, Jianzhong Zhang, Bin Tan, Chin Ping Huang, Qiang The present study aims to investigate the relationship between in silico experimental data and in vitro inhibitory data of polyphenols against α-glucosidase. The CDOCKER protocol in Discovery Studio was used to dock various polyphenols to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae α-glucosidase crystal structure.–CDOCKER energy values and the energy gap between the highest occupied molecular orbital energy and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital energy were used to study its consistency with in vitro inhibitory data. The results showed that the correlation trend was trustworthy regardless of the data deviation and low correlation coefficient. Despite slight disagreements with some specific polyphenols, the docking data generally explained the effect of the groups (–OH, glycosyl, galloyl, and caffeoyl). The docking results showed that compound 7, a quercetin derivative, can be recommended as a lead anti-diabetic compound, with additional anti-obesity effects. Galloyl and caffeoyl moieties are favorable to develop novel αG inhibitors. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/82777/1/%CE%B1-Glucosidase%20inhibitors%20consistency%20of%20in%20silico%20docking%20data%20with%20in%20vitro%20inhibitory%20data%20and%20inhibitory%20effect%20prediction%20of%20quercetin%20derivatives.pdf Zhu, Jianzhong and Zhang, Bin and Tan, Chin Ping and Huang, Qiang (2019) α-Glucosidase inhibitors: consistency of: in silico docking data with in vitro inhibitory data and inhibitory effect prediction of quercetin derivatives. Food & Function, 10 (10). pp. 6312-6321. ISSN 2042-6496; ESSN: 2042-650X https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31517355/ 10.1039/C9FO01333D
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
language English
description The present study aims to investigate the relationship between in silico experimental data and in vitro inhibitory data of polyphenols against α-glucosidase. The CDOCKER protocol in Discovery Studio was used to dock various polyphenols to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae α-glucosidase crystal structure.–CDOCKER energy values and the energy gap between the highest occupied molecular orbital energy and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital energy were used to study its consistency with in vitro inhibitory data. The results showed that the correlation trend was trustworthy regardless of the data deviation and low correlation coefficient. Despite slight disagreements with some specific polyphenols, the docking data generally explained the effect of the groups (–OH, glycosyl, galloyl, and caffeoyl). The docking results showed that compound 7, a quercetin derivative, can be recommended as a lead anti-diabetic compound, with additional anti-obesity effects. Galloyl and caffeoyl moieties are favorable to develop novel αG inhibitors.
format Article
author Zhu, Jianzhong
Zhang, Bin
Tan, Chin Ping
Huang, Qiang
spellingShingle Zhu, Jianzhong
Zhang, Bin
Tan, Chin Ping
Huang, Qiang
α-Glucosidase inhibitors: consistency of: in silico docking data with in vitro inhibitory data and inhibitory effect prediction of quercetin derivatives
author_facet Zhu, Jianzhong
Zhang, Bin
Tan, Chin Ping
Huang, Qiang
author_sort Zhu, Jianzhong
title α-Glucosidase inhibitors: consistency of: in silico docking data with in vitro inhibitory data and inhibitory effect prediction of quercetin derivatives
title_short α-Glucosidase inhibitors: consistency of: in silico docking data with in vitro inhibitory data and inhibitory effect prediction of quercetin derivatives
title_full α-Glucosidase inhibitors: consistency of: in silico docking data with in vitro inhibitory data and inhibitory effect prediction of quercetin derivatives
title_fullStr α-Glucosidase inhibitors: consistency of: in silico docking data with in vitro inhibitory data and inhibitory effect prediction of quercetin derivatives
title_full_unstemmed α-Glucosidase inhibitors: consistency of: in silico docking data with in vitro inhibitory data and inhibitory effect prediction of quercetin derivatives
title_sort α-glucosidase inhibitors: consistency of: in silico docking data with in vitro inhibitory data and inhibitory effect prediction of quercetin derivatives
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
publishDate 2019
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/82777/1/%CE%B1-Glucosidase%20inhibitors%20consistency%20of%20in%20silico%20docking%20data%20with%20in%20vitro%20inhibitory%20data%20and%20inhibitory%20effect%20prediction%20of%20quercetin%20derivatives.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/82777/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31517355/
_version_ 1681490862094155776
score 13.1944895