Conduct of neuro-oncology multidisciplinary team meetings and closing the ``gaps'' in the clinical management of childhood central nervous system tumors in a middle-income country

• Main Authors: Foo, Jen Chun, Jawin, Vida, Yap, Tsiao Yi, Bahuri, Nor Faizal Ahmad, Ganesan, Dharmendra, Mun, Kein Seong, Loh, Jasmin, Raja Aman, Raja Rizal Azman, Gottardo, Nicholas G., Qaddoumi, Ibrahim, Moreira, Daniel C., Rajagopal, Revathi
• Format: Article
• Published: Springer 2021
• Subjects: R Medicine
• Online Access: http://eprints.um.edu.my/34505/

Purpose Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) are essential in the clinical management of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Evaluations of the impact of MDTMs on childhood CNS tumors and clinicians' perspectives on their effectiveness are scarce. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of pediatric patients (aged <18 years) with CNS tumors diagnosed and treated in the Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Division at the University Malaya Medical Center from 2008 to 2019. We also conducted a web-based survey of the core members of the multidisciplinary team to evaluate the impact of the MDTMs. Results During the pre-MDTM era (2008-2012), 29 CNS tumors were diagnosed and treated, and during the MDTM era (2014-2019), 49 CNS tumors were diagnosed and treated. The interval for histologic diagnosis was significantly shorter during the MDTM era (p=0.04), but the interval from diagnosis to chemotherapy or radiotherapy and the 5-year overall survival of the 78 patients did not improve (62.1% +/- 9.0% vs. 68.8% +/- 9.1%; p=0.184). However, the 5-year overall survival of patients with medulloblastoma or rare tumors significantly improved in the MDTM era (p=0.01). Key factors that contributed to delayed treatment and poor outcomes were postoperative complications, the facility's lack of infrastructure, poor parental education about early treatment, cultural beliefs in alternative medicine, and infection during chemotherapy. Eighteen clinicians responded to the survey; they felt that the MDTMs were beneficial in decision-making and enhanced the continuity of coordinated care. Conclusion MDTMs significantly reduced the diagnostic interval and improved the overall outcomes. However, delayed treatment remains a major challenge that requires further attention.