GRP in Malaysia: the vertical and horizontal approaches
Regulatory inconsistencies generate significant trade, and other economic and administrative costs. The inconsistencies may be attributed to unintended actions of fragmentation and complexity of regulators, without taking into consideration of federal, state and local government requirements. In...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/1405/1/FH03-FUHA-18-22648.pdf http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/1405/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Regulatory inconsistencies generate significant trade, and other economic and
administrative costs. The inconsistencies may be attributed to unintended actions
of fragmentation and complexity of regulators, without taking into consideration of
federal, state and local government requirements. In other words, the interventions
made into economic activities, not just have created additional burdens to the
businesses but also to the all three-level governments in Malaysia. With the
growing use of regulatory management tools by both APEC, World Bank and
OECD, Malaysia has established an evidence-based ex-post evaluation to
strengthen good regulatory practices. The Malaysian Government has published
guidance documents on Good Regulatory Practice (GRP) Tools, with the latest
being namely vertical and horizontal ex-post evaluation.
This paper deliberates on the techniques implemented by Malaysia Productivity
Corporation (MPC) on detecting unnecessary regulatory burdens through reviews
of successful case studies. The contents are sourced from MPC’s latest publications
and minutes of meetings of the highest echelon in Malaysia Public-Private
collaboration projects. |
|---|