Where have your time and space gone? An analysis of technology addiction, surveillance capitalism, and the modern panopticon
Little attention has been paid to why individuals are addicted to Internet-related experiences. This research identifies a key driver of technology addiction by combining three perspectives: behavioural science, economics, and psychoanalysis. Behavioural science reveals that technology addiction...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2021
|
| Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/17874/1/52297-171712-1-PB.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/17874/ https://ejournals.ukm.my/malim/issue/view/1438 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Little attention has been paid to why individuals are addicted to Internet-related experiences.
This research identifies a key driver of technology addiction by combining three perspectives:
behavioural science, economics, and psychoanalysis. Behavioural science reveals that
technology addiction is produced by well-designed technology that fulfils humans’
fundamental needs. Capital economy analysis, called surveillance capitalism, offers a new
interpretation of the data-driven economy, in which Internet technology enterprises collect
feedback from users’ experiences and use said feedback to improve their products. The data
accumulation logic facilitates automatic thinking and the modification of users’ behaviours to
make a profit for the enterprises. Psychoanalysis clarifies the relationship between
surveillance power and behavioural changes in society. The Panopticon, a central observation
tower with a circle of prison cells, achieved an automatic function of power to control
individuals’ performances and minds. Technology addiction is a symptom of the modern
Panopticon because a common mechanism works between the Panopticon and surveillance
capitalism, occupying individuals’ time and space and executing the automatic function of the
surveillance power that facilitates behavioural modification. We conclude that depriving
individuals of both time and space is a key driver of technology addiction that threatens
sovereignty in a data-driven economy. We also provide three solutions to technology addiction:
acknowledgement of the benefits and risks of technology use, acceptance of the complexity
underlying technology-related issues, and protection of individual sovereignty. |
|---|